Introduction
Protected areas are clearly defined geographical space, recognized, dedicated and managed through legal or other effective means to achieve the long term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values as defined by Dudley (2008). Terrestrial protected areas have always gained more consideration in the designation of protected areas than freshwater protected areas (Abell et al., 2007). As of year 2008, there exist over 120,000 recognized terrestrial protected areas worldwide, but only few were for freshwater conservation as reported by United Nations Environment Programme – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2008). Most research on biodiversity concentrated on the terrestrial realm determining changes in terrestrial biodiversity. Some studies that considered freshwater biodiversity, reports that freshwater species exhibited changes over the time (Heino et al., 2008). Many of the terrestrial protected areas around the globe include freshwater components; however the contribution of terrestrial protected areas to conservation of freshwater biodiversity is unclear. Therefore it is essential to explore the potential of terrestrial protected areas in the conservation of freshwater biodiversity.
Freshwater biodiversity
The
variety of life form and the ecosystems that make up the freshwater regions
around the world is termed freshwater biodiversity. Freshwater biodiversity
consists of freshwater ecosystems, including lakes, ponds, reservoirs, rivers,
streams, groundwater and wetlands as per Wangchuck Centennial Park (WCP), University of
Calcutta (UoC), and WWF Bhutan (2012). Freshwater
encompasses only 0.01% of the world’s water covering only 0.8% of earth’s
surface area. Out of the estimated 1.8 million described species globally,
freshwater support at least 100, species estimated to 6% of the total (Balian et al., 2008). A
study on freshwater biodiversity in Eastern Himalaya by the IUCN (2010) reveals
the region as home to significant number of species dependent on freshwater
habitats (Allen et al., 2010). The
study pointed that out of 1,073 species recorded, 77 species are globally
threatened. However, the knowledge on freshwater biodiversity in the world is
deficient particularly for invertebrates and microbes. Even vertebrates are only
partially known (Stiassny, 2002).
State of freshwater
biodiversity
Freshwater
biodiversities are under severe pressure from human and the rich biodiversity
are diminishing rapidly (Vorosmarty et al.,
2010). Worldwide change has affected biodiversity in terrestrial, marine and
freshwater dominion. The future is not bright for biodiversity in natural ecosystems
as reported by Thomas et al. (2004).
It is suggested that decline in freshwater biodiversity to be rapid as compared
to or even will exceed the estimated rate. It has been predicted that the
extinction rate of freshwater species to be almost five times greater than terrestrial species and three times that of
coastal marine species (Ricciardi & Rasmussen, 1999).
Threats to freshwater
biodiversity
The
threats to freshwater biodiversity around are described in five broad
categories in many studies till date as reported by Dudgeon, et al. (2005). Overexploitation,
water pollution, flow modification, destruction or habitat degradation and
invasion by exotic species are the threats to freshwater biodiversity. Overexploitation
affects vertebrates while other threats affect all freshwater diversity ranging
from microbes to megafauna. The collective influences of the five threat
classes resulted in decline in population and range reduction of freshwater
biodiversity (Dudgeon, et al., 2005).
Terrestrial protected
areas and its potential for conservation of freshwater biodiversity
Terrestrial
protected areas are areas dedicated to protection and conservation of natural
biodiversity through legal and other effective mechanism as described by
International Union for Conservation of Nature (1994). The areas often cover
inaccessible high elevation regions usually targeting conservation of large
mammals and birds. Some protected areas are designated in upstream catchment
where conservation of freshwater biodiversity is not a priority (Abraham and
Kelkar, 2012). Such protected areas with partial coverage of riverine habitats and
with no intention of freshwater biodiversity conservation may not be adequate
for conservation of freshwater biodiversity.
Although
the terrestrial protected areas are established for conservation of terrestrial
features, protected areas cover majority of ecoregions and consequently have
potential to represent freshwater diversity at a large scale. In addition, the
protected areas are managed primarily for conservation of natural resources
therefore has the potential to serve the conservation of freshwater
biodiversity (Lawrence et al., 2011).
Protected areas in
Bhutan and its implications on freshwater biodiversity
In
Bhutan, 51.44 % of the total land area is under protected areas, biological
corridors and conservation areas (Gross National Happiness Commission, 2013).
Protected areas in the country cover almost all 20 districts, from north to
south and represents wide aspects of biodiversity. The protected areas include
tremendous amount of inland freshwater biodiversity including glaciers, rivers,
streams and lakes (RSPN, 2014). The Forest and Nature Conservation Act, 1995
and the Forest and Nature Conservation Rules of Bhutan, 2006 restrict any activities
related to destruction and disturbance to the natural ecosystems within
protected areas. Therefore, although not
meant for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity, the protected areas have
immense potential in conservation of freshwater biodiversity.
Conclusion
A
study by Abraham and Kelkar (2012) states that,
threats to freshwater biodiversity was significantly higher in unprotected
areas than protected areas. It also reveals that protected areas were
consistently higher in both species richness and species diversity than
unprotected areas. In a similar study by Atkore et al. (2011) reports higher species richness in protected areas. Therefore,
it is evident that the terrestrial protected areas have high potential for
conservation of freshwater biodiversity have important role in conserving
freshwater biodiversity.
Freshwater
biodiversity make up valuable natural resources in economic, cultural,
aesthetic, scientific and education. Conservation and management of freshwater
biodiversity is of immense importance. The managers need to be more aware and
knowledgeable to further strengthen existing level of freshwater biodiversity
conservation (Nel et al., 2007).
References
Abell,
R., Allan, J. D., & Lehner, B. (2007). Unlocking the potential of
protected areas for freshwaters. Biological Conservation 134(1), 48.
Abraham,
R. K., & Kelkar, N. (2012). Do terrestrial protected areas conserve
freshwater fish diversity? Results from the Western Ghats of India. Oryx,
46, pp 544-553 doi:10.1017/S0030605311000937.
Allen,
D. J., et al. (2010). The status
and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in the Eastern Himalayas.
Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, and Coimbatore, India: Zoo Outreach
Organisation.
Atkore,
S. V., & Johnsingh, A. (2011). Patterns of diversity and conservation
status of freshwater fishes in the tributaries of the river Ramganga in the
Shiwaliks of the western Himalayas. Current Science, 100, 731–736.
Balian,
E. V., Segers, H., Leveque, C., & Martens, K. (2008). An introduction to
the Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment. (FADA) project. Hydrobiologia
595, 3–8.
Dudgeon,
D., Arthington, A. H., Gassner, M. O., Kawabata, Z.-I., Knowler, D. J.,
Leveque, C., et al. (2005). Freshwater
biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. UK:
Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Dudley,
N. (Ed.). (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management
Categories. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of
Nature (IUCN).
Gross
National Happiness Commission. (2013). SAARC DEVELOPMENT GOALS: Country
Report, BHUTAN. Thimphu, Bhutan: Gross National Happiness Commission.
Heino,
J., Virkkala, R., & Toivonen, H. (2008). Climate change and freshwater
biodiversity:detected patterns, future trends and adaptations in northern
regions. Finland: University of Oulu.
Lawrence,
D. J., Larson, E. R., liermann, C. A., Mims, M. C., Pool, T. K., & Olden,
J. D. (2011). National parks as protected areas for U.S. freshwater fish
diversity. USA: School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of
Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195.
Nel,
J. L., Roux, D., Maree, G., Kleynhans, C., Moolman, J., & Reyers, B.
(2007). Rivers in peril inside and outside protected areas: a systematic
approach to conservation assessment of river ecosystems. Diversity and
Distributions, 13, 341–352.
Ricciardi,
A., & Rasmussen, J. B. (1999). Extinction rates of North American
freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology, 13(5), 1220‐1222.
Royal
Socity for Protection of Nature (RSPN). (2014). Royal Socity for Protection
of Nature. Retrieved September 2, 2014, from www.rspnbhutan.org: http://www.rspnbhutan.org/programs/environment-education/watershed-management.html
Stiassny,
M. L. (2002). Conservation of freshwater fish biodiversity: the knowledge
impediment. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fur Ichthyologie 3, 7–18.
Thomas,
C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., &
Collinghm, Y. C. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature
427, 145–148.
United
Nations Environment Programme - World Conservation Monitoring Centre. (2008). State
of the world’s protected areas: an annual review of. Cambridge, United
Kingdom: United Nations Environment Programme ‐ World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
Vorosmarty,
C. M. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.
Nature 467, 555–561.
Wangchuck
Centennial Park (WCP), University of Calcutta (UoC) & WWF Bhutan. (2012). Preliminary
report on Freshwater biodiversity in Wangchuck Centennial Park, Bumthang.
WCP, UoC and WWF Bhutan.

No comments:
Post a Comment